nelhage has decided I lost my iPod headphones. Acquire Bose In-Ear headphones ($100)?
Looks like I'll be going for something different, but not necessarily cheaper.
Asked 2 years ago
Sure! The sound quality (especially base) is actually pretty absurd. You'd listen to your iPod a lot more .
- perturbed
-
Check if you can get a discount.
- lakmiseiru
-
Do you have the money to spend? If so, I'd go with Bose.
My choice: Nah, just get something cheaper. You don't use the iPod much anyways.
- kyrandil
-
There's a lot to be said for not being immersed in music all the time. And the word's bass.
- jtu
-
Though sound quality doesn't really bother me as much as it seems to bother other people.
- jesse
-
The bose in-ears are supposed to suck. Try the Ultimate Ears, my current favorites. (Also, check out headphone.com)
- ntn
-
Go for comfort from in-ear, and sound quality from circumaural.
- kettlefish
-
NO! The Bose In-Earphones are crap. Look into Shure in-earphones (e2c's range about $200) or even Westone UM2's. they are extremely high quality in-ear monitors that are worth the cost. Or, spring for the Bose Quiet Comfort over-ear headphones, or Triports, about $150. Bigger, but decent sound.
Copyright © 2006–2007 Best Practical Solutions, LLC • Contact us
If you make a stupid choice because a website tells you to, it's your own damn fault.